[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] VT is comically slow
Rik van Riel wrote: > VT by itself seems fine, but once a VT domain is running a workload that > is network intensive combined with a disk/cpu intensive workload, things > get incredibly slow. > > Operations that take less than a second with either workload running > alone can now take many seconds, sometimes the better part of a minute! > > Is this some limitation of the qemu device model? We (Virtual Iron) are in a process of developing accelerated drivers for the HVM guests. Our goal for this effort is to get as close to native performance as possible and to make paravirtualization of guests unnecessary. The drivers currently support most flavors of RHEL, SLES and Windows. The early performance numbers are encouraging. Some numbers are many times faster than QEMU emulation and are close to native performance numbers (and we are just beginning to tune the performance). Just to give people a flavor of the performance that we are getting, here are some preliminary results on Intel Woodcrest (51xx series), with a Gigabit network, with SAN storage and all of the VMs were 1 CPU. These numbers are very early, disks numbers are very good and we are still tuning the network numbers. Bonnie-SAN - bigger is better RHEL-4.0 (32-bit) VI-accel RHEL-4.0(32-bit) Write, KB/sec 52,106 49,500 Read, KB/sec 59,392 57,186 netperf - bigger is better RHEL-4.0 (32-bit) VI-accel RHEL-4.0(32-bit) tcp req/resp (t/sec) 6,831 5,648 SPECjbb2000 - bigger is better RHEL-4.0 (32-bit) VI-accel RHEL-4.0(32-bit) JRockit JVM thruput 43,061 40,364 This code is modeled on Xen backend/frontend architecture concepts and will be GPLed. -Alex V. Alex Vasilevsky Chief Technology Officer, Founder Virtual Iron Software, Inc _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |