[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] Xenoprof passive domain support fixes
Renato, One thing I am still puzzled by in all of this is the following: In the "opreport -x" output, I get entries for both pxen*-syms (which is a symbolic link to the xen-syms I supplied on the opreport command line) AND I get entries for xen-syms itself: samples| %| ------------------ 76273 23.7270 papps2-syms 73306 22.8040 pxen2-syms 63550 19.7691 vmlinux 43024 13.3839 libc-2.4.so 24406 7.5922 xen-syms 17278 5.3748 jbd 12228 3.8039 ext3 9845 3.0626 oprofiled 395 0.1229 qemu-dm <snip> Why is that? (I've been told the xen-syms samples are samples in the hypervisor due to dom0 activity, but I've been unable to verify this). Additionally, I find that "opreport -lx" will report "no symbols" for papps*-syms: samples % app name symbol name 76273 23.7738 papps2-syms (no symbols) 19131 5.9630 pxen2-syms l2e_rw_fault 17278 5.3854 jbd (no symbols) 12228 3.8114 ext3 (no symbols) 11840 3.6905 libc-2.4.so vfprintf 10256 3.1967 libc-2.4.so _IO_file_xsputn@@GLIBC_2.2.5 8587 2.6765 xen-syms general_protection 7374 2.2984 pxen2-syms vmx_asm_vmexit_handler 5212 1.6245 pxen2-syms resync_all 5128 1.5984 xen-syms write_cr3 <snip> unless I do an "ln -s /boot/vmlinux2-syms /boot/papps2-syms". (It appears that opreport should be creating papps2-syms instead of vmlinux2-syms??) Finally, I'm not convinced yet that the sample reports for the HVM guest (papps2-syms or pvmlinux2-syms, in this case) are correct. I'm going to run some native and xen profile sessions using the same benchmark and see if I can correlate the results at all. -- Ray Bryant AMD Performance Labs Austin, Tx 512-602-0038 (o) 512-507-7807 (c) _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |