Re: [Xen-devel] How Xen handles Dom1 interrupts?

["Jun Koi" <junkoi2004@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Daniel,

On 8/11/06, Daniel Stodden <stodden@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-08-11 at 19:03 +0900, Jun Koi wrote:
> > Good morning,
> >
> > I am new to Xen, and trying to understand how Xen works. I have some
> > questions about virtualization of interrupts on Xen. Thanks in advance
> > for all helps.
> >
> > 1) From papers about Xen architecture found at Xen homepage, Xen
> > seemingly intercepts interrupts of Dom1 (paravirtualization). So
> > interrupts occur in Dom1's context are sent to Xen, and Xen handles
> > them. Is that correct?
>
> similar to interrupts to a native operating systems, interrupts could
> occur in just any context (as long as they're not blocked).
>
> the domU never 'receives' the interrupt in a way that it won't even be
> able to install a handler for it. the idt belongs to xen, and xen is
> where it is actually handled, interrupting whatever used to be running
> when it occurred.
>
> > But then how can Dom1 gets the interrupts? For example if int3 occurs
> > inside Dom1, Xen intercepts int3, but then how debugger (like gdb) can
> > still work in Dom1? Maybe Xen sends that interrupt back to Dom1 after
> > processing it in VMM layer?
>
> hardware interrupts in turn drive 'virtual interrupts', which are in the
> paravirtualized case a pure software abstraction. in xen, you'll find a
> lot of references to a concept called 'event channels', and that's just
> that.
>
> so it's xen making then decision on whether a domain interrupt handler
> is called, which one's called, when it's called, and whether anything
> called at all. don't worry, in practice, xen is doing the right thing,
> but that's the way it needs to work. :).
>
> > 2) I have read
> > linux-xen-sparse/arch/i386/kernel/{traps-xen.c,traps.c,vmlinux.lds.S},
> > and looks like Dom1 still handles interrupts itself? Why, because I
> > suppose that the VMM already intercepts those interrupts?
>
> an guest system, whether it's virtualized or not, is not living in a
> vacuum. it needs some kind of signalling from the hardware environment,
> whether it's virtual or physical, in order to get notified of events.
> that's 'asynchronous input' of some kind, not necessarily purelay
> hardware interrupt driven, though.
>
> e.g. it needs a regular timer interrupt as well as as notification of
> events regarding virtual device interfaces.
> so it still has interrupt handlers.
>
> it is, however, not modifying the real IDT. see e.g. trap_init() in
> traps-xen.c and read about HYPERVISOR_set_trap_table in the interface
> documentations.
Very interesting. So here is what I imagine about things in Xen:

- When Dom1 boots, it asks VMM (via set_trap_table hypercall) to setup
the IDT for it. Meanwhile Dom1 still setups its IDT but all the
interrupts are from event-channels instead of from physical interrupts
like in native case. An event sent to Dom1 via event-channel will fire
a virtual interrupt, and Dom1's interrupt handler will handle it like
in native case.
- When an interrupt occurs in Dom1's context, VMM handles it first,
then fires an event corresponding to the interrupt via event-channel
to Dom1, thus creates an virtual interrupt. Dom1 processes this
virtual interrupt.

Is that all correct?


I follow the above assumption, and as an example, trying to track down
how int3 is processed if we use gdb to debug an application in Dom1.
But looks like the int3 handler in VMM never send event to Dom1 as I
supposed. Or I missed something? Any pointer on which code of VMM does
this?

Thanks.
Jun

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel