[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-devel] Re: Is hypercall_hvm_op in changeset 11060 effective?


  • To: "Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Keir Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 09:37:12 +0100
  • Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 01:46:04 -0700
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: Aca9yABevSNKoKxKQoeZHIOaybJ/twALEKfOAAuHctAAJFLMkA==
  • Thread-topic: Is hypercall_hvm_op in changeset 11060 effective?



On 12/8/06 4:20 pm, "Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


> Just found the code in hvmloader.c seems not work.
> hvm_param.domid = DOMID_SELF;
> hvm_param.index = HVM_PARAM_APIC_ENABLED;
> if (!hypercall_hvm_op(HVMOP_get_param, &hvm_param) &&
> hvm_param.value)
> create_mp_tables();
> 
> Need more investigation.

The use of HVMOP_get_param in hvmloader was inconsistent with its
implementation within Xen. This is now fixed in c/s 11070. Thanks for
pointing out the problem!

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.