[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-devel] RE: Is hypercall_hvm_op in changeset 11060 effective?


  • To: "Keir Fraser" <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: "Li, Xin B" <xin.b.li@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 18:17:05 +0800
  • Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 06:02:25 -0700
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: Aca9yABevSNKoKxKQoeZHIOaybJ/twALEKfOAAuHctAAJFLMkAA1uYtQ
  • Thread-topic: Is hypercall_hvm_op in changeset 11060 effective?

 
>> Just found the code in hvmloader.c seems not work.
>> hvm_param.domid = DOMID_SELF;
>> hvm_param.index = HVM_PARAM_APIC_ENABLED;
>> if (!hypercall_hvm_op(HVMOP_get_param, &hvm_param) &&
>> hvm_param.value)
>> create_mp_tables();
>> 
>> Need more investigation.
>
>The use of HVMOP_get_param in hvmloader was inconsistent with its
>implementation within Xen. This is now fixed in c/s 11070. Thanks for
>pointing out the problem!
>

Still can not work, I got:
(XEN) (GUEST: 6) HVM Loader
(XEN) (GUEST: 6) Detected Xen v3.0
(XEN) (GUEST: 6) Loading ROMBIOS ...
(XEN) (file=hvm.c, line=596) Bad HVM op 1222980.
(XEN) (GUEST: 6) hypercall_hvm_op returned error: 38
(XEN) (GUEST: 6) Loading Cirrus VGABIOS ...
(XEN) (GUEST: 6) Loading VMXAssist ...
(XEN) (GUEST: 6) VMX go ...

Maybe caused by the hypercall page 
-Xin

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.