[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Xen-devel] [SVM][PATCH] remove redundant do_softirq


  • To: "Woller, Thomas" <thomas.woller@xxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: "Woller, Thomas" <thomas.woller@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 17:19:30 -0500
  • Delivery-date: Thu, 31 Aug 2006 15:20:16 -0700
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
  • Thread-index: AcbNSwvHkGSU9QVES9us3NPZbFdIkwAAFrQA
  • Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] [SVM][PATCH] remove redundant do_softirq

Ok, patch now attached.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> Woller, Thomas
> Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2006 5:16 PM
> To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [Xen-devel] [SVM][PATCH] remove redundant do_softirq
> 
> > from Keir:
> > Another thing: the code you have under case VMEXIT_INTR, 
> which raises 
> > schedule softirq, seems pointless. All interrupt work will 
> happen in 
> > proper interrupt context triggered on STGI. Should the code under 
> > VMEXIT_INTR simply be removed?
> 
> Remove redundant do_softirq in the VMEXIT_INTR handler.
> 
> Applies cleanly to 11390.
> Please apply to xen-unstable.hg.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tom Woller <thomas.woller@xxxxxxx>
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> 
> 
> 

Attachment: svm_remove_softirq_11390.patch
Description: svm_remove_softirq_11390.patch

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.