[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] pciback_field_is_dup needs a fix

To: Jambunathan K <jambunathan@xxxxxxxxxx>, <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Keir Fraser <keir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 09:18:56 +0000
Cc: sanjeev@xxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 09 Mar 2007 01:18:15 -0800
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
Thread-index: AcdiK/ZgNR3yBs4fEduPNwAX8io7RQ==
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] pciback_field_is_dup needs a fix



On 8/3/07 19:39, "Jambunathan K" <jambunathan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Shouldn't pciback_field_is_dup(dev, field->offset) be scoped to include
> the base_offset as well?

Absolutely. Thanks for tracking it down!

 -- Keir


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- [PATCH] [pciback] Re: [Xen-devel] pciback_field_is_dup needs a fix
  - From: Chris

References:
- [Xen-devel] pciback_field_is_dup needs a fix
  - From: Jambunathan K

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] LTTng-Xen Buffer shared between the hypervisor and a dom0 process
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] vmx status report against changeset 14287 --Test Blocked by Bug 919
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] pciback_field_is_dup needs a fix
Next by thread: [PATCH] [pciback] Re: [Xen-devel] pciback_field_is_dup needs a fix
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.