[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Testing the kernels
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 06:54:18PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Jeremy Fitzhardinge writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Testing the kernels"): > > Regressions? > > Well, not really regressions in the view of the testing system, > because the "tested" kernel tree was only just created so has all the > failures, and xen-unstable was pushed manually recently. > > > > Can this be done in a way that doesn't involve waiting for you ? The > > > testing system obviously pushes automatically and it would be good to > > > publish those things in the right places without further manual > > > intervention. > > > > Yes. I was planning on setting up a cronjob on kernel.org to update the > > branch once we'd sorted out all the details. > > OK. I can arrange to prod some script of yours if you prefer. > > > > When we update the kernel version we intend to use, this should be a > > > fast forward update and gated though the testing in the ordinary way, > > > so it should update the same tag. Do you agree ? > > > > Hm. I was hoping at some point to have two kernels going through > > testing. We're planning on supporting 2.6.32 for a long time, so we > > should keep testing that. But I'd also like to start tracking upstream > > more closely (starting with .36) which we should also test. > > OK, I guess I could have a different branch for my testing which > tracks a different branch of yours. I've called this one "linux", > as in > Subject: [linux test] 2057: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED > but perhaps I should rename it ? > If it's 2.6.32.x I guess it should say linux-2.6.32.x ? -- Pasi _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |