[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Performance numbers on PV-on-HVM
On 10/04/2010 10:08 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Mon, 4 Oct 2010, Stefano Stabellini wrote: >> On Fri, 1 Oct 2010, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: >>>>> Hopefully Jeremy merges 2.6.32-pvhvm to xen/stable-2.6.32.x branch.. >>>> >>>> The problem is that Jeremy's stable branch is sufficiently different >>>> from stable 2.6.32 that the port in non-trivial. >>>> It would probably easier for him to cherry-pick the last 6 patches in >>>> the series. >>> I tried this, but it is a bit awkward: >>> >>> Two of them have already been applied verbatim. >>> >>> The blkfront name patch clashes with something similar that's already in >>> xen/next (the version I currently have does xlbd_reserve_minors(), but >>> this branch's patch doesn't). I don't know which version to take. >>> >> just take the latest version >> >>> The hvc console patches clash fairly badly with the dom0 ones; nothing >>> fundamental, but fiddly. >> skip them for now: they are not critical and at some point I'll rebase >> them on top of the "xen initial domain" series that has dom0 hvc_xen >> support and you'll be able to pull them without conflicts. >> >>> The balloon.c changes clash with the largepage ballooning stuff. >>> >> >> I have reworked the balloon patch on top of stable 2.6.32, I am attaching >> the patch to this email. > > of course if you would like me to prepare a branch on top of > stable-2.6.32.x I can do that as well A resolved merge would be better than rebasing onto stable-2.6.32.x. J _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |