[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-devel] HVM vs. PV in Reliability


  • To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: Yutao Liu <universalbillow@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 20:55:40 +0800
  • Delivery-date: Sun, 20 Feb 2011 04:56:27 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=IUoVKskYxZ38FCMSRpKysLnGFPjm+++cgezEh36yvWAikFZCkpsOP1dFT2yt07Qowh 8AuRbsCEG1rIhL2gxPunC+ahZpklqlWAw/HFRL4lmERNNeZ7CpqvwStm7yKHv35QXgqM EOnxdU++BWvd3MxwjUiOa4al5LShQU3e0dLqQ=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

Hello,I'm wondering are there any datum that can compare the reliability/availability/dependability of HVM and PV, especially the driver of them?
For example, how many bugs found in the drivers of HVM and PV? Can any experimental datum tell HVM model is safer or otherwise?...
If a driver in HVM crashed, will it affect DomU, Dom0, or others? and what about PV?
Is there some research or paper talk about this?

I am so grateful if someone can give some advice about above, Thanks.  

-Luit
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.