[Top] [All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] tools/libxc/xc_cpuid_x86.c:cpuid()'s inline asm

To: Keir Fraser <keir.xen@xxxxxxxxx>
From: Olaf Hering <olaf@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 16:26:55 +0100
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 02 Dec 2011 15:28:21 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

On Fri, Dec 02, Keir Fraser wrote:

> I think reg constraint failures had only been reported on 32-bit. So how
> about the attached patch?

+        : "0" (input[0]), "1" (count), "S" (_regs)

_regs is undeclared in 32bit, I think it should be regs.

Olaf

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] tools/libxc/xc_cpuid_x86.c:cpuid()'s inline asm
  - From: Keir Fraser

References:
- [Xen-devel] tools/libxc/xc_cpuid_x86.c:cpuid()'s inline asm
  - From: Jan Beulich
- Re: [Xen-devel] tools/libxc/xc_cpuid_x86.c:cpuid()'s inline asm
  - From: Keir Fraser

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Load increase after memory upgrade (part2)
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2 of 2] xenpaging: handle GNTST_eagain in kernel drivers
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] tools/libxc/xc_cpuid_x86.c:cpuid()'s inline asm
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] tools/libxc/xc_cpuid_x86.c:cpuid()'s inline asm
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.