Re: [Xen-devel] qemu-upstream stubdom - status?

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Justin Cormack writes ("Re: qemu-upstream stubdom - status?"):
> On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 6:03 PM, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > The big one there is pthreads but I don't think we actually need that
> > for qemu-dm, provided we have aio, which it looks like we do ?
> 
> The aio syscalls are not in the rump kernel at present. They could
> easily be added but not sure that signal notification will work in
> rump, although polling should. Unfortunately NetBSD does not have
> kqueue aio support yet, which would be ideal.

Hmm.  I was going to say that qemu doesn't want signal notification.
But actually it is doing something with threads.  I think this can
probably be fixed in qemu.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel