[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] xen/arm: vcpu: Correctly release resource when the VCPU failed to initialized
On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 20:15 +0100, Julien Grall wrote: > While I was adding new failing code at the end of the function, I've noticed > that the vtimers are not freed which mess all the timers and will crash Xen > quickly when the page will be reused. > > Currently neither vcpu_vgic_init nor vcpu_vtimer_init fail, so we > are safe for now. With the new GICv3 code, the former function will be able > to fail. This will result to a memory leak. > > Call vcpu_destroy if the initialization has failed. We also need to add a > boolean to know if the vtimers are correctly setup as the timer common code > doesn't have safe guard against removing non-initialized timer. > > Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx> I was about to acked + apply but it failed to build on arm64 with: domain.c: In function 'alloc_vcpu_struct': /local/scratch/ianc/devel/committer.git/xen/include/xen/lib.h:19:31: error: static assertion failed: "!(sizeof(*v) > PAGE_SIZE)" #define BUILD_BUG_ON(cond) ({ _Static_assert(!(cond), "!(" #cond ")"); }) ^ domain.c:415:5: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON' BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*v) > PAGE_SIZE); ^ struct arch_vcpu is apparently now too large. I had also reworded your commit message somewhat: xen/arm: vcpu: Correctly release resources when a VCPU fails to initialize While I was adding new failing code at the end of the function, I noticed that the vtimers are not freed which messes up all the timers and will crash Xen quickly when the page s reused. Currently neither vcpu_vgic_init nor vcpu_vtimer_init fails, so we are safe for now. With the new GICv3 code, the former function will be able to fail. This will result in a memory leak. Call vcpu_destroy if the initialization has failed. We also need to add a boolean to know if the vtimers are correctly setup as the timer common code doesn't have any safeguard against removing a non-initialized timer. Ian. > > --- > Changes in v2: > - Update commit message > --- > xen/arch/arm/domain.c | 8 ++++++-- > xen/arch/arm/vtimer.c | 5 +++++ > xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h | 1 + > 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/domain.c b/xen/arch/arm/domain.c > index ccccb77..c47db4a 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/arm/domain.c > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/domain.c > @@ -468,12 +468,16 @@ int vcpu_initialise(struct vcpu *v) > processor_vcpu_initialise(v); > > if ( (rc = vcpu_vgic_init(v)) != 0 ) > - return rc; > + goto fail; > > if ( (rc = vcpu_vtimer_init(v)) != 0 ) > - return rc; > + goto fail; > > return rc; > + > +fail: > + vcpu_destroy(v); > + return rc; > } > > void vcpu_destroy(struct vcpu *v) > diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/vtimer.c b/xen/arch/arm/vtimer.c > index cb690bb..c515e7e 100644 > --- a/xen/arch/arm/vtimer.c > +++ b/xen/arch/arm/vtimer.c > @@ -77,11 +77,16 @@ int vcpu_vtimer_init(struct vcpu *v) > : GUEST_TIMER_VIRT_PPI; > t->v = v; > > + v->arch.vtimer_initialized = 1; > + > return 0; > } > > void vcpu_timer_destroy(struct vcpu *v) > { > + if ( !v->arch.vtimer_initialized ) > + return; > + > kill_timer(&v->arch.virt_timer.timer); > kill_timer(&v->arch.phys_timer.timer); > } > diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h > index ec66a4e..1be3da2 100644 > --- a/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h > +++ b/xen/include/asm-arm/domain.h > @@ -285,6 +285,7 @@ struct arch_vcpu > > struct vtimer phys_timer; > struct vtimer virt_timer; > + bool_t vtimer_initialized; > } __cacheline_aligned; > > void vcpu_show_execution_state(struct vcpu *); _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |