[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] xen/arm: vcpu: Correctly release resource when the VCPU failed to initialized
Hi Ian, On 05/02/2014 01:25 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 20:15 +0100, Julien Grall wrote: >> While I was adding new failing code at the end of the function, I've noticed >> that the vtimers are not freed which mess all the timers and will crash Xen >> quickly when the page will be reused. >> >> Currently neither vcpu_vgic_init nor vcpu_vtimer_init fail, so we >> are safe for now. With the new GICv3 code, the former function will be able >> to fail. This will result to a memory leak. >> >> Call vcpu_destroy if the initialization has failed. We also need to add a >> boolean to know if the vtimers are correctly setup as the timer common code >> doesn't have safe guard against removing non-initialized timer. >> >> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx> > > I was about to acked + apply but it failed to build on arm64 with: > > domain.c: In function 'alloc_vcpu_struct': > /local/scratch/ianc/devel/committer.git/xen/include/xen/lib.h:19:31: > error: static assertion failed: "!(sizeof(*v) > PAGE_SIZE)" > #define BUILD_BUG_ON(cond) ({ _Static_assert(!(cond), "!(" #cond > ")"); }) > ^ > domain.c:415:5: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON' > BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*v) > PAGE_SIZE); > ^ > struct arch_vcpu is apparently now too large. > > I had also reworded your commit message somewhat: > xen/arm: vcpu: Correctly release resources when a VCPU fails to initialize > > While I was adding new failing code at the end of the function, I noticed > that the vtimers are not freed which messes up all the timers and will > crash > Xen quickly when the page s reused. > > Currently neither vcpu_vgic_init nor vcpu_vtimer_init fails, so we > are safe for now. With the new GICv3 code, the former function will be > able > to fail. This will result in a memory leak. > > Call vcpu_destroy if the initialization has failed. We also need to add a > boolean to know if the vtimers are correctly setup as the timer common > code > doesn't have any safeguard against removing a non-initialized timer. The commit 6fedf29 "xen/arm: Drop event_mask in arch_vcpu" which makes this patch compiles on both arm32 and arm64. I think you can safely push this patch now :). Thanks, -- Julien Grall _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |