|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] xen/arm: vcpu: Correctly release resource when the VCPU failed to initialized
Hi Ian,
On 05/02/2014 01:25 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 20:15 +0100, Julien Grall wrote:
>> While I was adding new failing code at the end of the function, I've noticed
>> that the vtimers are not freed which mess all the timers and will crash Xen
>> quickly when the page will be reused.
>>
>> Currently neither vcpu_vgic_init nor vcpu_vtimer_init fail, so we
>> are safe for now. With the new GICv3 code, the former function will be able
>> to fail. This will result to a memory leak.
>>
>> Call vcpu_destroy if the initialization has failed. We also need to add a
>> boolean to know if the vtimers are correctly setup as the timer common code
>> doesn't have safe guard against removing non-initialized timer.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I was about to acked + apply but it failed to build on arm64 with:
>
> domain.c: In function 'alloc_vcpu_struct':
> /local/scratch/ianc/devel/committer.git/xen/include/xen/lib.h:19:31:
> error: static assertion failed: "!(sizeof(*v) > PAGE_SIZE)"
> #define BUILD_BUG_ON(cond) ({ _Static_assert(!(cond), "!(" #cond
> ")"); })
> ^
> domain.c:415:5: note: in expansion of macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON'
> BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(*v) > PAGE_SIZE);
> ^
> struct arch_vcpu is apparently now too large.
>
> I had also reworded your commit message somewhat:
> xen/arm: vcpu: Correctly release resources when a VCPU fails to initialize
>
> While I was adding new failing code at the end of the function, I noticed
> that the vtimers are not freed which messes up all the timers and will
> crash
> Xen quickly when the page s reused.
>
> Currently neither vcpu_vgic_init nor vcpu_vtimer_init fails, so we
> are safe for now. With the new GICv3 code, the former function will be
> able
> to fail. This will result in a memory leak.
>
> Call vcpu_destroy if the initialization has failed. We also need to add a
> boolean to know if the vtimers are correctly setup as the timer common
> code
> doesn't have any safeguard against removing a non-initialized timer.
The commit 6fedf29 "xen/arm: Drop event_mask in arch_vcpu" which makes
this patch compiles on both arm32 and arm64.
I think you can safely push this patch now :).
Thanks,
--
Julien Grall
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |