[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V3] netif.h: Document xen-net{back, front} multi-queue feature
On 02/05/14 17:23, Ian Campbell wrote: Er, yes. Looking back over that I've no idea what I intended to write, but it clearly isn't what I actually wrote! I will resend with your suggested wording.On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 13:26 +0100, Andrew J. Bennieston wrote:+ * Queues replicate the shared rings and event channels, and + * "feature-split-event-channels" may be used when using multiple queues, but + * are not required to do so.I cannot parse the second two thirds of this sentence, in particular "but are to required to do so". Is a word (drivers?) missing between "but" and "are"? Or did you mean "but it is not required..." maybe. How about: * Queues replicate the shared rings and event channels. "feature-split-event-channels" may * optionally be used when using multiple queues, but is not mandatory. ? Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |