[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] cpupools: retry cpupool-destroy if domain in cpupool is dying
On 08.05.2014 17:10, George Dunlap wrote: On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:On 07.05.2014 15:10, George Dunlap wrote:On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 8:52 AM, Juergen Gross <juergen.gross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:When a cpupool is destroyed just after the last domain has been stopped the domain might already be removed from the cpupool without having decremented the domain count of the cpupool. This will result in rejection of the cpupool-destroy operation.I'm a bit confused. What's the sched_move_domain() for, then? If we're going to handle "dying domains" by doing a retry, could we just get rid of it?The sched_move_domain() is still needed for cases where a domain stays dying for a longer time, e.g. when a dom0 process is still referencing some of it's memory pages. This may be a rare situation, but being unable to use a physical cpu for another cpupool just because of this case is worse than this little piece of code, IMO.And I take it there are times when the move fails for whatever reason? ENOMEM for example. Could you add a comment explaining this above the for() loop then, for posterity? Could you define 'this', please? The reason for the sched_move_domain() is mentioned in the head comment of the function (zombie domains). The possibility of a failing sched_move_domain() is obvious by the return value checking. Juergen -- Juergen Gross Principal Developer Operating Systems PSO PM&D ES&S SWE OS6 Telephone: +49 (0) 89 62060 2932 Fujitsu e-mail: juergen.gross@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Mies-van-der-Rohe-Str. 8 Internet: ts.fujitsu.com D-80807 Muenchen Company details: ts.fujitsu.com/imprint.html _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |