[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/4] x86/nmi: remove spurious local_irq_enable from check_nmi_watchdog()



>>> On 14.05.14 at 15:31, <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 14/05/14 14:25, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 14.05.14 at 14:58, <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> All callers of check_nmi_watchdog() already have local irqs enabled so
>>> remove the unpaired local_irq_enable().
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  xen/arch/x86/nmi.c |    1 -
>>>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/nmi.c b/xen/arch/x86/nmi.c
>>> index 526020b..18d3820 100644
>>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/nmi.c
>>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/nmi.c
>>> @@ -126,7 +126,6 @@ int __init check_nmi_watchdog (void)
>>>  
>>>      for_each_online_cpu ( cpu )
>>>          prev_nmi_count[cpu] = nmi_count(cpu);
>>> -    local_irq_enable();
>> 
>> I guess this will want to be replaced by a suitable ASSERT(), to make
>> sure eventual new callers adhere to the described rule.
> 
> smp_call_function() and on_selected_cpus() which is where this matters
> already has such an ASSERT() so I don't think another one needs to be
> added here.

Okay, that's true.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.