[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/4] x86/nmi: remove spurious local_irq_enable from check_nmi_watchdog()
>>> On 14.05.14 at 15:31, <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 14/05/14 14:25, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> On 14.05.14 at 14:58, <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> All callers of check_nmi_watchdog() already have local irqs enabled so >>> remove the unpaired local_irq_enable(). >>> >>> Signed-off-by: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@xxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> xen/arch/x86/nmi.c | 1 - >>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/nmi.c b/xen/arch/x86/nmi.c >>> index 526020b..18d3820 100644 >>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/nmi.c >>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/nmi.c >>> @@ -126,7 +126,6 @@ int __init check_nmi_watchdog (void) >>> >>> for_each_online_cpu ( cpu ) >>> prev_nmi_count[cpu] = nmi_count(cpu); >>> - local_irq_enable(); >> >> I guess this will want to be replaced by a suitable ASSERT(), to make >> sure eventual new callers adhere to the described rule. > > smp_call_function() and on_selected_cpus() which is where this matters > already has such an ASSERT() so I don't think another one needs to be > added here. Okay, that's true. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |