Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: Expose hypervisor's PVH support via xen_caps

[Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 05/23/2014 11:00 AM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 23/05/14 15:55, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >   xen/arch/x86/setup.c | 5 +++++
> >   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> If the plan is to try and PVH and HVM back into one mode as far as Xen
> is concerned, doesn't this become redundant?
Yes, I was thinking about this but we currently don't have (or, rather, 
I can't think of) a good way to determine whether we can start a PVH 
guest. We can grep the log but that doesn't feel like a particularly 
good solution.
One option could be to postpone this patch until 4.5 freezes and see 
whether we indeed followed up on the plan and if we didn't then 
integrate it.
-boris

> ~Andrew
>
> > diff --git a/xen/arch/x86/setup.c b/xen/arch/x86/setup.c
> > index b2a808a..59b31b1 100644
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/setup.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/setup.c
> > @@ -1462,6 +1462,11 @@ void arch_get_xen_caps(xen_capabilities_info_t *info)
> >           safe_strcat(*info, s);
> >           snprintf(s, sizeof(s), "hvm-%d.%d-x86_64 ", major, minor);
> >           safe_strcat(*info, s);
> > +        if ( hvm_funcs.pvh_supported )
> > +        {
> > +            snprintf(s, sizeof(s), "pvh-%d.%d-x86_64 ", major, minor);
> > +            safe_strcat(*info, s);
> > +        }
> >       }
> >   }
> >   

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel