[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: arm: invalidate caches after map_domain_page done
Oh, now got your point. >>> On 01/08/14 11:01, Andrii Tseglytskyi wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi Andrii, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 01/08/14 08:25, Andrii Tseglytskyi wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> In some cases, memory page returned by map_domain_page() contains >>>>>> invalid data. Issue is observed when map_domain_page() is used >>>>>> immediately after p2m_lookup() function, when random page of >>>>>> guest domain memory is need to be mapped to xen. Data on this >>>>>> already memory page may be not valid. Issue is fixed when >>>>>> caches are invalidated after mapping is done. >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Andrii Tseglytskyi <andrii.tseglytskyi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>>> --- >>>>>> xen/arch/arm/mm.c | 2 +- >>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>>>> >>>>>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/mm.c b/xen/arch/arm/mm.c >>>>>> index 0a243b0..085780a 100644 >>>>>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/mm.c >>>>>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/mm.c >>>>>> @@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ void *map_domain_page(unsigned long mfn) >>>>>> * We may not have flushed this specific subpage at map time, >>>>>> * since we only flush the 4k page not the superpage >>>>>> */ >>>>>> - flush_xen_data_tlb_range_va_local(va, PAGE_SIZE); >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Why did you remove the flush TLB? It's requirement to make sure the VA >>>>> will pointed to the right PA. >>>>> >>>>>> + clean_and_invalidate_xen_dcache_va_range((void *)va, PAGE_SIZE); >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> This is not the right approach, map_domain_page is heavily used to map >>>>> hypercall data page. Those pages must reside in normal inner-cacheable >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> What if use map_domain_page() outside hypercall ? >>> >>> >>> >>> In general we require cache enabled for any communication with Xen. Until >>> now, we didn't have any case where map_domain_page is used outside this >>> scope. >>> >>> >>>>> memory. So cleaning the cache is useless and time consuming. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I see that without cache invalidating page contains invalid data. Let >>>> me explain more deeply: >>>> As far as you know - I resumed my work with remoteproc MMU driver and >>>> I started fixing review comments. One of your comments is that >>>> ioremap_nocache() API should not be used for mapping domain pages, >>>> therefore I tried using map_domain_page, and this works fine for me >>>> only in case if I invalidate caches of already mapped va. >>>> >>>> I compared page dumps - 1 st page was mapped with ioremap_nocache() >>>> function, second page was mapped with map_domain_page() function, and >>>> I got the following output: >>>> >>>> (XEN) SGX_L2_MMU: pte_table[0] 0x9d428019 tmp[0] 0x9d428019 >>>> (XEN) SGX_L2_MMU: pte_table[1] 0x9d429019 tmp[1] 0x9d429019 >>>> (XEN) SGX_L2_MMU: pte_table[2] 0x9d42e019 tmp[2] 0x9d42e019 >>>> (XEN) SGX_L2_MMU: pte_table[3] 0x9d42f019 tmp[3] 0x00000000 <-- data >>>> is not valid here >>>> >>>> pte_table pointer is mapped using ioremap_nocache(), tmp is mapped >>>> using map_domain_page() >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> If you want to clean and invalidate the cache, even though I don't >>>>> think >>>>> this right by reading the commit message, you have to introduce a new >>>>> helper. >>>>> >>>> >>>> Taking in account your previous comment - that map_domain_page() is >>>> used for mapping of hypercall data page, looks like I can't use this >>>> API as is. In my code I solved this by calling of >>>> clean_and_invalidate_xen_dcache_va_range() immediately after page is >>>> mapped. This works fine for me - no invalid data is observed. >>> >>> >>> >>> What is the attribute of this page in guest? non-cacheable? >>> >> >> It is domain heap memory. I expect it should be cacheable. How can I >> make sure with this? > > > I'm lost... > > The page you are trying to map belongs to a guest, right? When the guest > writes data in this page. Does it map with cacheable attribute or not? I > suspect no. Hard to say. This page is allocated using usual kernel API such as kmalloc(). Then its pfn is stored in MMU 1-st level translation pagetable. Before storing - kernel driver flush corresponding cache ranges. After this - remoteproc_iommu framework translates pfns to mfns. So - I would expect that after map_domain_page() function call all data will be valid. > > I think your current problem is the cache contains stall data. In this case > you have to only invalidate the cache. > May work. But it looks like new helper should be introduced in this case. I see that only clean_and_invalidate_xen_dcache_va_range API is present, no standalone API for invalidating only. > -- > Julien Grall -- Andrii Tseglytskyi | Embedded Dev GlobalLogic www.globallogic.com _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |