[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen: arm: invalidate caches after map_domain_page done



Oh, now got your point.


>>> On 01/08/14 11:01, Andrii Tseglytskyi wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 12:23 PM, Julien Grall <julien.grall@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Andrii,
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 01/08/14 08:25, Andrii Tseglytskyi wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> In some cases, memory page returned by map_domain_page() contains
>>>>>> invalid data. Issue is observed when map_domain_page() is used
>>>>>> immediately after p2m_lookup() function, when random page of
>>>>>> guest domain memory is need to be mapped to xen. Data on this
>>>>>> already memory page may be not valid. Issue is fixed when
>>>>>> caches are invalidated after mapping is done.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Andrii Tseglytskyi <andrii.tseglytskyi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>     xen/arch/arm/mm.c |    2 +-
>>>>>>     1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/mm.c b/xen/arch/arm/mm.c
>>>>>> index 0a243b0..085780a 100644
>>>>>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/mm.c
>>>>>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/mm.c
>>>>>> @@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ void *map_domain_page(unsigned long mfn)
>>>>>>          * We may not have flushed this specific subpage at map time,
>>>>>>          * since we only flush the 4k page not the superpage
>>>>>>          */
>>>>>> -    flush_xen_data_tlb_range_va_local(va, PAGE_SIZE);
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Why did you remove the flush TLB? It's requirement to make sure the VA
>>>>> will pointed to the right PA.
>>>>>
>>>>>> +    clean_and_invalidate_xen_dcache_va_range((void *)va, PAGE_SIZE);
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> This is not the right approach, map_domain_page is heavily used to map
>>>>> hypercall data page. Those pages must reside in normal inner-cacheable
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> What if use map_domain_page() outside hypercall ?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> In general we require cache enabled for any communication with Xen. Until
>>> now, we didn't have any case where map_domain_page is used outside this
>>> scope.
>>>
>>>
>>>>> memory. So cleaning the cache is useless and time consuming.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I see that without cache invalidating page contains invalid data. Let
>>>> me explain more deeply:
>>>> As far as you know - I resumed my work with remoteproc MMU driver and
>>>> I started fixing review comments. One of your comments is that
>>>> ioremap_nocache() API should not be used for mapping domain pages,
>>>> therefore I tried using map_domain_page, and this works fine for me
>>>> only in case if I invalidate caches of already mapped va.
>>>>
>>>> I compared page dumps - 1 st page was mapped with ioremap_nocache()
>>>> function, second page was mapped with map_domain_page() function, and
>>>> I got the following output:
>>>>
>>>> (XEN) SGX_L2_MMU: pte_table[0] 0x9d428019 tmp[0] 0x9d428019
>>>> (XEN) SGX_L2_MMU: pte_table[1] 0x9d429019 tmp[1] 0x9d429019
>>>> (XEN) SGX_L2_MMU: pte_table[2] 0x9d42e019 tmp[2] 0x9d42e019
>>>> (XEN) SGX_L2_MMU: pte_table[3] 0x9d42f019 tmp[3] 0x00000000  <-- data
>>>> is not valid here
>>>>
>>>> pte_table pointer is mapped using ioremap_nocache(), tmp is mapped
>>>> using map_domain_page()
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> If you want to clean and invalidate the cache, even though I don't
>>>>> think
>>>>> this right by reading the commit message, you have to introduce a new
>>>>> helper.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Taking in account your previous comment - that map_domain_page() is
>>>> used for mapping of hypercall data page, looks like I can't use this
>>>> API as is. In my code I solved this by calling of
>>>> clean_and_invalidate_xen_dcache_va_range() immediately after page is
>>>> mapped. This works fine for me - no invalid data is observed.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> What is the attribute of this page in guest? non-cacheable?
>>>
>>
>> It is domain heap memory. I expect it should be cacheable. How can I
>> make sure with this?
>
>
> I'm lost...
>
> The page you are trying to map belongs to a guest, right? When the guest
> writes data in this page. Does it map with cacheable attribute or not? I
> suspect no.

Hard to say. This page is allocated using usual kernel API such as
kmalloc(). Then its pfn is stored in MMU 1-st level translation
pagetable.
Before storing - kernel driver flush corresponding cache ranges. After
this - remoteproc_iommu framework translates pfns to mfns.
So - I would expect that after map_domain_page() function call all
data will be valid.

>
> I think your current problem is the cache contains stall data. In this case
> you have to only invalidate the cache.
>

May work. But it looks like new helper should be introduced in this
case. I see that only clean_and_invalidate_xen_dcache_va_range API is
present, no standalone API for invalidating only.



> --
> Julien Grall



-- 

Andrii Tseglytskyi | Embedded Dev
GlobalLogic
www.globallogic.com

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.