Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH RFC v2 1/4] x86/mm: Shadow and p2m changes for PV mem_access

["Aravindh Puthiyaparambil (aravindp)" <aravindp@xxxxxxxxx>]

>>>For this second option, NMIs are a concern. Whether that makes it
>>>not viable I'm not certain. We really need to weigh benefits and risks
>>>here, and from a project wide perspective I'm currently viewing the
>>
>> From what I can tell, Andrew does think that this route is a viable option
>> and I will defer to you and him about this. If there is agreement that this
>> approach is acceptable, I will send out another version of the patches
>> implementing it.
>
>Yes, I think you should go ahead with this, understanding that there's
>no promise (just reasonable likelihood) to take it in the end.

Understood. I will send out another RFC series.

Thanks,
Aravindh


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel