[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] xen/arm: check on domain type against hardware support
On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, 2014-09-29 at 13:28 +0100, Julien Grall wrote: >> Hi Ian, >> >> On 09/29/2014 01:23 PM, Ian Campbell wrote: >> > On Fri, 2014-09-26 at 11:28 +0530, vijay.kilari@xxxxxxxxx wrote: >> >> From: Vijaya Kumar K <Vijaya.Kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> >> >> Some arm64 platforms implement only aarch64 mode. So allow >> >> domains that are only 64-bit >> >> >> >> Signed-off-by: Vijaya Kumar K <Vijaya.Kumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> > Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> > I think this is a bug fix so we should take it for 4.5. >> >> I made a quick comment in response to your answer on V1. > > Vijay, based on Julien's comments on v1 I'm inclined to > s/cpu_has_a32/cpu_has_arm/, so we refer to arm+thumb not a32+thumb which > combines to different naming schemes. An alternative would be > s/cpu_has_thumb/cpu_has_t32/ but I don't like that much. > > Does that work for you? I can make the trivial change so no need to > resend (unless you want to). Sorry for late reply, I was on vacation. I am ok with this change. Regards Vijay _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |