[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V2 for-4.5] xen/arm64: Use __flush_dcache_area instead of __flush_dcache_all

To: Roy Franz <roy.franz@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 09:09:16 +0100
Cc: keir <keir@xxxxxxx>, tim <tim@xxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@xxxxxxx>, Fu Wei <fu.wei@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 08:09:38 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xen.org>

On Mon, 2014-10-20 at 12:20 -0700, Roy Franz wrote:
> I think the simplest thing to do is to have the C code that calls this

Ah, I'd forgotten there was some C-land nearby, yes that would indeed be
far more convenient!

(and I've just seen the updated patch, applying shortly...)

Ian.



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH V2 for-4.5] xen/arm64: Use __flush_dcache_area instead of __flush_dcache_all
  - From: Roy Franz
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V2 for-4.5] xen/arm64: Use __flush_dcache_area instead of __flush_dcache_all
  - From: Ian Campbell
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V2 for-4.5] xen/arm64: Use __flush_dcache_area instead of __flush_dcache_all
  - From: Roy Franz

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for 4.5 v7 1/1] Add mmio_hole_size
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 30769: regressions - trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V2 for-4.5] xen/arm64: Use __flush_dcache_area instead of __flush_dcache_all
Next by thread: [Xen-devel] [linux-next test] 30753: tolerable trouble: blocked/broken/fail/pass
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.