[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for 4.5 v7 1/1] Add mmio_hole_size
On Tue, 2014-10-21 at 08:46 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 21.10.14 at 00:01, <dslutz@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 10/20/14 10:17, Ian Campbell wrote: > >> On Mon, 2014-10-13 at 08:51 -0400, Don Slutz wrote: > >>> --- a/tools/libxl/libxl_types.idl > >>> +++ b/tools/libxl/libxl_types.idl > >>> @@ -391,6 +391,7 @@ libxl_domain_build_info = Struct("domain_build_info",[ > >>> ("timeoffset", string), > >>> ("hpet", > >>> libxl_defbool), > >>> ("vpt_align", > >>> libxl_defbool), > >>> + ("mmio_hole_size", uint64), > >> Please make this a MemKB at the libxl interface level and convert > >> internally to whatever hvmloader expects. It seems that a more > >> conventional name would also have a _memkb suffix. Perhaps > >> mmio_hole_memkb? (size seems to be implicit to me). > >> > > > > Ok, Jan Beulich had proposed the name with the _size (on 27 Jun 2014), > > but he > > did also say "(whether the xl config option should also get renamed I'm not > > sure - the xl maintainers will know )", (so I am taking this as ok from > > Jan) I will > > rename to mmio_hole_memkb here. > > My remark was really intended for you to actively inquire about the > config option name. Or better yet, look at the existing examples for both libxl API and xl configuration file names and if you aren't sure then ask. foo_memkb is conventional in the libxl interface. For the xl.cfg level the units are typically mbytes and the names unitless (i.e. no _memkb suffix), often due to xm legacy. The existing xl.cfg names are things like "memory", "maxmem", "shadow_memory", "videoram". I think mmio_hole or mmio_hole_size would be a good enough name for xl.cfg. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |