Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 53884: regressions - FAIL

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 11.05.15 at 10:12, <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 11/05/2015 09:08, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 09.05.15 at 20:57, <osstest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> flight 53884 xen-unstable real [real]
>>> http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/53884/ 
>>>
>>> Regressions :-(
>>>
>>> Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
>>> including tests which could not be run:
>>>  build-amd64-xsm               5 xen-build                 fail REGR. vs. 
>>> 50405
>> This is due to e5786bae04 ("x86/pvh: use a custom IO bitmap for
>> PVH hardware domains"). Having requested th addition during
>> review I of course took it for granted that you build tested your
>> change. As dealing with this imo also means moving the code
>> addition into the already existing (or a new) CONFIG_X86 block
>> (along with moving the declaration to a more suitable header), I
>> think a fixup patch would not be the right way to deal with this,
>> and hence I think I'm going to revert that change for the time
>> being.
> 
> Given this reversion (and confirmation that the build is fixed), would a
> force push be justified?  We are now a full month behind, with other 
> OSSTest issues still outstanding.

While it'd be really nice to do so, the flight here didn't test the tip of
staging (onto which I'll push the revert in a few minutes), so a force
push may be a little difficult to arrange. I'm also afraid that doing so
would yield the XSM build failure an allowable one going forward.
Otoh, considering that we got two almost-pushes recently, I'm quite
hopeful that we'll get a real push pretty soon.

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel