Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 57852: regressions - FAIL

[Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 11:21 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 03:47:22PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 57852: 
> > regressions - FAIL"):
> > > Could it be an missing microcode update? I don't know if the OSSTest does
> > > the ucode=scan or updates the microcode later?
> > 
> > I think osstest's machines don't get microcode updates.  I'm no expert
> > on x86 microcode, but my understanding is:
> > 
> > Microcode updates (i) have to be loaded dynamically at boot time and
> > (ii) are regarded as a non-free package by Debian.
> > 
> > We could arrange to install the non-free microcode package.  I haven't
> > looked into it but I would expect that to automatically arrange to
> > load the microcode for native boots.  It IMO ought to do the same for
> > non-native boots but I wouldn't rely on that being the case.
> 
> If Debian is using dracut

It doesn't, it uses initramfs-tools.

I'm not sure about Wheezy but from Jessie onwards installing the
microcode packages adds hooks which makes initramfs-tools do the right
thing.

>  it just requires adding in /etc/dracut.conf
> early_microcode=yes
> 
> and from there on any regenerated initramfs will have the required
> microcode. Then 'ucode=scan' needs to be added on the Xen command line.

This is still needed with initramfs-tools.

There's also Debian bug #785187 (discussed on xen-devel) which stops
ucode=scan from working, for a reason I've not had a changce to dig into
yet.


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel