Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] build: convert NR_CPUS to Kconfig

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 11.01.16 at 16:06, <cardoe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 1/11/16 8:24 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 09.01.16 at 00:17, <cardoe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> This converts the usage of NR_CPUS / MAX_PHYS_CPUS to Kconfig as
>>> CONFIG_NR_CPUS.
>> 
>> Considering the size of the patch, the doubling of the identifier's
>> length, and the fact that even Linux continues to use NR_CPUS
>> I wonder whether we wouldn't be better of simply having
>> 
>> #define NR_CPUS CONFIG_NR_CPUS
> 
> Is that a "please do this for a v2" or "what do the other maintainers
> think?" statement?

More the former, unless the latter gets answered by "no, this is a
bad idea".

Jan


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel