[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] x86/xsave: use alternative asm on xsave side.
>>> On 02.02.16 at 08:11, <shuai.ruan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > --- a/xen/arch/x86/xstate.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/xstate.c > @@ -248,24 +248,26 @@ void xsave(struct vcpu *v, uint64_t mask) > uint32_t hmask = mask >> 32; > uint32_t lmask = mask; > int word_size = mask & XSTATE_FP ? (cpu_has_fpu_sel ? 8 : 0) : -1; > +#define XSAVE(pfx) \ > + alternative_io_3(".byte " pfx "0x0f,0xae,0x27\n", \ > + ".byte " pfx "0x0f,0xae,0x37\n", \ > + X86_FEATURE_XSAVEOPT, \ > + ".byte " pfx "0x0f,0xc7,0x27\n", \ > + X86_FEATURE_XSAVEC, \ > + ".byte " pfx "0x0f,0xc7,0x37\n", \ > + X86_FEATURE_XSAVES, \ > + "=m" (*ptr), \ > + "a" (lmask), "d" (hmask), "D" (ptr)) > > if ( word_size <= 0 || !is_pv_32bit_vcpu(v) ) > { > typeof(ptr->fpu_sse.fip.sel) fcs = ptr->fpu_sse.fip.sel; > typeof(ptr->fpu_sse.fdp.sel) fds = ptr->fpu_sse.fdp.sel; > > - if ( cpu_has_xsaves ) > - asm volatile ( ".byte 0x48,0x0f,0xc7,0x2f" > - : "=m" (*ptr) > - : "a" (lmask), "d" (hmask), "D" (ptr) ); > - else if ( cpu_has_xsavec ) > - asm volatile ( ".byte 0x48,0x0f,0xc7,0x27" > - : "=m" (*ptr) > - : "a" (lmask), "d" (hmask), "D" (ptr) ); > - else if ( cpu_has_xsaveopt ) > + if ( cpu_has_xsaveopt || cpu_has_xsaves ) > { > /* > - * xsaveopt may not write the FPU portion even when the > respective > + * xsaveopt/xsaves may not write the FPU portion even when the > respective Apart from this line now being too long and hence the entire comment needing re-formatting Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |