[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [tip:x86/asm] x86/mm/xen: Suppress hugetlbfs in PV guests
>>> On 22.04.16 at 20:03, <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 04/22/2016 02:47 AM, tip-bot for Jan Beulich wrote: >> Commit-ID: 103f6112f253017d7062cd74d17f4a514ed4485c >> Gitweb: > http://git.kernel.org/tip/103f6112f253017d7062cd74d17f4a514ed4485c >> Author: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx> >> AuthorDate: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 00:27:04 -0600 >> Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx> >> CommitDate: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 10:05:00 +0200 >> >> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/hugetlb.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/hugetlb.h >> index f8a29d2..e6a8613 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/hugetlb.h >> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/hugetlb.h >> @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ >> #include <asm/page.h> >> #include <asm-generic/hugetlb.h> >> >> +#define hugepages_supported() cpu_has_pse >> > > Please don't use the cpu_has_* macros anymore, they are going away soon. > > In this case it should be static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PSE). I can certainly do that, but this - will (mildly) harm backportability - imo should have been requested much earlier (when the patch was still under discussion) Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |