Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC 0/5] xen/arm: support big.little SoC

[Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>]

On 22/09/16 11:51, George Dunlap wrote:
> On 22/09/16 10:27, Peng Fan wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 10:50:23AM +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote:
>> "cpupool-cluster-split" maybe a better name?
> 
> I think we should name this however we name the different types of cpus.
>  i.e., if we're going to call these "cpu classes", then we should call
> this "cpupool-cpuclass-split" or something.

I'd go with "cpupool-split feature=cpuclass". This can be extended later
to e.g.:

cpupool-split feature=cpuclass,numa

In order to combine it with "cpupool-numa-split" (which will be the same
as "cpupool-split feature=numa").


Juergen


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel