Re: [Xen-devel] PVHv2 vs HVMlite

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 03:19:32PM +0100, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 27/09/16 15:08, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
> > I will be dusting off Linux domU PVHv2 patches now that ACPI changes are
> > getting close to being accepted.
> > 
> > Last version of that patch referred to these guests as 'hvmlite',
> > including in names of variables, routines etc. I was hesitant to remove
> > "classic" PVH code and use "pvh" instead of "hvmlite" because we didn't
> > have dom0 v2 support and so I kept existing PVHv1 code intact.
> > 
> > Do we still want to do this (i.e. keep v1 code and use "hvmlite")? FWIW,
> > I am not aware of anyone using PVH dom0 (or PVH domU for that matter).
> 
> I think we should remove the PVHv1 code from Linux and then reuse the
> "pvh" name.

+1

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel