[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 03/30] xen/x86: fix parameters and return value of *_set_allocation functions
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 04:39:02AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 27.09.16 at 17:56, <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Return should be an int, and the number of pages should be an unsigned long. > > I can see the former, but why the latter? Acting on 32-bit quantities > is a little cheaper after all. This was requested by Andrew in the previous version: https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-07/msg03126.html But yes, an unsigned int is enough to hold the maximum number of pages for a domain given than we support up to 1TB for HVM guests. Or maybe there are plans to increase the maximum supported memory per guest? Roger. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |