[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.8] ipxe: update to newer commit [and 1 more messages]
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.8] ipxe: update to newer commit"): > That was eventually done. I'm not sure exactly when the change was > made. Does gcc -Wno-foo work properly on all the gcc's we care about ? Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.8] ipxe: update to newer commit"): > Just fyi I have run into an issue with -Wno-override-init use in Linux > 4.8 on gcc 4.1.x, so what you say doesn't appear to hold for all gcc > versions we permit to be used. Well, that answers my question above. I think the right approach is to: * Test -Wno-this-is-not-a-warning-option. If gcc accepts it, add -Wno-something to disable the nonnull check· * Review the misleading indentations and if there are only a few, fix them in a downstream patch. Or, if there are many, decide to tolerate them. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |