[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.8] ipxe: update to newer commit [and 1 more messages]



Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.8] ipxe: update to newer 
commit"):
> That was eventually done.  I'm not sure exactly when the change was
> made.  Does gcc -Wno-foo work properly on all the gcc's we care about ?

Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.8] ipxe: update to newer 
commit"):
> Just fyi I have run into an issue with -Wno-override-init use in Linux
> 4.8 on gcc 4.1.x, so what you say doesn't appear to hold for all gcc
> versions we permit to be used.

Well, that answers my question above.

I think the right approach is to:

 * Test -Wno-this-is-not-a-warning-option.  If gcc accepts it,
   add -Wno-something to disable the nonnull check·

 * Review the misleading indentations and if there are only a few, fix
   them in a downstream patch.  Or, if there are many, decide to
   tolerate them.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.