[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/3] x86/setup: do not relocate Xen over current Xen image placement
>>> On 11.12.17 at 15:59, <daniel.kiper@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 04:51:32AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >>> On 04.12.17 at 11:24, <daniel.kiper@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > + if ( (end > s) && (end - reloc_size >= _end - _start) ) >> >> In your earlier mails following v1 you had __pa(_end) here on the >> right side. Why is this _end - _start again now (which is 2Mb too >> little imo with the current XEN_IMG_OFFSET value)? > > (end - reloc_size + XEN_IMG_OFFSET >= __pa(_end)) and If you used this expression, I think I could live without it having a comment. > (end - reloc_size >= _end - _start) are equal. > > You should remember that there is nothing to copy between 0 and > XEN_IMG_OFFSET. If, however, you want to stick to the expression you currently use, I think this very much needs a comment. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |