Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v7 10/11] viridian: add implementation of synthetic timers

["Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxx>]

>>> On 15.03.19 at 16:40, <Paul.Durrant@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> So, AIUI the reason you wanted it added was that you wanted to avoid 
> multiple calls hvm_vcpu_has_pending_irq() from returning different intack 
> values? But looking again, this could easily happen if a higher irr bit gets 
> set between calls (which can apparently happen asynchronously) so I'm really 
> no longer sure why I need to avoid multiple polls. What is the problem that 
> needs to be avoided?

Hmm, true. Looks like I've mis-guided you, I'm sorry for that.

Jan



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel