Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/2] xen: implement VCPUOP_register_runstate_phys_memory_area

[Andrii Anisov <andrii.anisov@xxxxxxxxx>]

On 14.05.19 14:24, Julien Grall wrote:
> > > I think there are an agreement that the two methods should not be used together.
> > For a domain or for a particular VCPU?
> > How should we response on the request to register paddr when we already have 
> > registered vaddr and vice versa?
>  From the discussion with Jan, you would tear down the previous solution and 
> then
> register the new version. So this allows cases like a bootloader and a kernel 
> using different version of the interface.
I'm not sure Jan stated that, he rather questioned that.

Jan, could you please confirm you agree that it should be dropped already 
registered runstate and (potentially) changed version in case of the new 
register request?

--
Sincerely,
Andrii Anisov.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel