[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Status of 4.13
> On Nov 21, 2019, at 8:41 AM, Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 21.11.2019 08:36, Jürgen Groß wrote: >> On 21.11.19 08:30, Steven Haigh wrote: >>> On 2019-11-21 17:05, Jürgen Groß wrote: >>>> Where do we stand with Xen 4.13 regarding blockers and related patches? >>>> >>>> 2. Ryzen/Rome failures with Windows guests: >>>> What is the currently planned way to address the problem? Who is >>>> working on that? >>> >>> A workaround was found by specifying cpuid values in the Windows VM >>> config file. >>> >>> The workaround line is: >>> cpuid = [ "0x80000008:ecx=xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx0100xxxxxxxxxxxx" ] >>> >>> It was suggested that this be documented - but no immediate action >>> should be taken - with a view to correct this properly in 4.14. >> >> I'm aware of the suggestion, but not of any decision. :-) > > It was my understanding that we'd cap the 4-bit value to 7 for > the time being. I think George was planning to send a patch. On that also, I’m aware of the suggestion, but not of any decision. I don’t think I got much feedback, positive or negative, about the idea. Suppose we implement the limit for 4.13. If someone runs Linux VMs on 4.12 a system with a hardware value of 7 for apic_id_size, the guests will see 8. If they then migrate to 4.13, the value will magically change under their feet to 7. Is that OK? -George _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |