Re: [PATCH 00/10] x86: mm (mainly shadow) adjustments

[Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On 17/04/2020 15:23, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Large parts of this series are to further isolate pieces which
> are needed for HVM only, and hence would better not be built
> with HVM=n. But there are also a few other items which I've
> noticed along the road.
>
> 01: mm: no-one passes a NULL domain to init_xen_l4_slots()
> 02: shadow: drop a stray forward structure declaration
> 03: shadow: monitor table is HVM-only
> 04: shadow: sh_update_linear_entries() is a no-op for PV
> 05: mm: monitor table is HVM-only
> 06: shadow: sh_remove_write_access_from_sl1p() can be static
> 07: shadow: the guess_wrmap() hook is needed for HVM only
> 08: mm: pagetable_dying() is HVM-only
> 09: shadow: the trace_emul_write_val() hook is HVM-only
> 10: shadow: don't open-code shadow_blow_tables_per_domain()

Patch 1 I think ought to be dropped.  Everything else Acked-by: Andrew
Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, ideally with the suggested tweak in
patch 3.

~Andrew