[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 00/10] x86: mm (mainly shadow) adjustments

To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
From: Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2020 10:04:23 +0100
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, George Dunlap <george.dunlap@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Sat, 18 Apr 2020 09:04:26 +0000
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>

At 16:23 +0200 on 17 Apr (1587140581), Jan Beulich wrote:
> Large parts of this series are to further isolate pieces which
> are needed for HVM only, and hence would better not be built
> with HVM=n. But there are also a few other items which I've
> noticed along the road.

Acked-by: Tim Deegan <tim@xxxxxxx>
with two suggestions that I've sent separately.

Cheers,

Tim.

References:
- [PATCH 00/10] x86: mm (mainly shadow) adjustments
  - From: Jan Beulich

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 07/10] x86/shadow: the guess_wrmap() hook is needed for HVM only
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH][RESEND] xen/arm: vgic-v3: fix GICD_ISACTIVER range
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 00/10] x86: mm (mainly shadow) adjustments
Next by thread: [GIT PULL] xen: branch for v5.7-rc2
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.