Re: [PATCH] xen/arm: fix SBDF calculation for vPCI MMIO handlers

[Ian Jackson <iwj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Julien Grall writes ("Re: [PATCH] xen/arm: fix SBDF calculation for vPCI MMIO 
handlers"):
> On 28/10/2021 16:27, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> > bridge as private and using info->gpa - GUEST_VPCI_ECAM_BASE...
> > So, I would stay with simpler
> > 
> >       if ( bridge )
> >          {
> >              sbdf.sbdf = VPCI_ECAM_BDF(info->gpa - bridge->cfg->phys_addr);
> >              sbdf.seg = bridge->segment;
> >          }
> >          else
> >              sbdf.sbdf = VPCI_ECAM_BDF(info->gpa - GUEST_VPCI_ECAM_BASE);
> 
> I am fine with that so long this is part of an helper (maybe 
> vpci_sbdf_from_addr()) rather than duplicated.

There are a number of patches that I'm getting CC'd on related to ARM
and vpci (according to the Subject).  Are these targeted for 4.16 ?
Most of them don't have 4.16 Subject tags.

Am I getting these in my capacity as a REST maintainer ?

I am finding it difficult to see the wood for the trees.
It would be really helpful if these vpci fixes were collected
together into a series.

Thanks,
Ian.
(writing as Xen 4.16 Release Manager)