[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 2/3] CHANGELOG: Add missing entries for work during the 4.17 release
- To: Henry Wang <Henry.Wang@xxxxxxx>
- From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2022 15:08:45 +0100
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=suse.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=ogewk2GqxyZhk4qra3R1iN0Isd8UxgdYdYLOlrEG7Bk=; b=k6dC70TppX8IdcqkDyA3Q5fffXJNM/2q1/fFCUY0/taKKxHbYlMeqCxTV+Kql3lO1m1KVdrtJj1IOeWA6uq/xGgbqcoIgX3ZO2tAQGbzo9ZVa+OaLYaI7T6YDc3GIPxb1241Ynb9ymVEHYEJIG/Jk3PoGWBx+XL/uFVNB39fA5E7Vu8YXxwVXRBNi2LzUNqGs5uKDL3oJzYnfgg7WZ9vnZcxKTID08jkXGSlaDavKdNy/YeWx3ZPCfuRkUW6DVsYBZQriR1/dcRGwqvMWriO++jyT7zywXEjJ+m5NbkkDC4bl4Ej5Soc+Stusy4kPF3ifnW7/6YXNRuGSvrjbsXCKA==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=Aw3fvTPZKUrET96znaE1Yv659nzGqrfLxSsu9LgD0BBLGJgQqwGgbEKTu2WtnE+bcS2pII4sYebUuNOFtbdlNDFydTeRbohTE1Ssh842LtRrb1bUJGafxj2RoXWrlvyqMUvMxy7ALxyjw6TrkmZ3n1MX7g9hJcGn6/kd0YYYPxx9optDymFZ4BRijUn744DNaUK/b8fYNjHtjpwhRbKID8cVLNnk8n5m50dpqD/UjuG19LP2LD8Hp+2a1fxJq3aluSVvTtV5wu0fczwZAmlfavSqMRPnNCZmE92JFrMmh0sfFpdusL3xBMF1/piiiYTuZIeARyUb8TWvuqkVDla4tA==
- Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=suse.com;
- Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Fri, 11 Nov 2022 14:09:01 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 11.11.2022 14:58, Henry Wang wrote:
> Another question for adding another entry for x86 that worth to
> brag about a little bit: I did another dig into patchwork and found that
> this [1] might be a good candidate. IIUC __ro_after_init is a good
> feature that both x86 and Arm have leveraged in different level today,
> so probably the __ro_after_init might worth an entry in CHANGELOG.
>
> However I saw your comments in [1] so I am not really sure if you are
> happy with that, maybe we need to change the wording a little bit to
> remove your concern? Would you mind sharing some thoughts?
My view hasn't changed, but if Andrew and Roger think this should be mentioned,
then I'm not going to stand in the way.
Jan
> [1]
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/xen-devel/patch/20220309123936.16991-3-andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx/
>
> Kind regards,
> Henry
>>
>> Jan
|
