[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [PATCH 2/3] CHANGELOG: Add missing entries for work during the 4.17 release
- To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- From: Henry Wang <Henry.Wang@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2022 14:12:10 +0000
- Accept-language: zh-CN, en-US
- Arc-authentication-results: i=2; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 63.35.35.123) smtp.rcpttodomain=lists.xenproject.org smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dmarc=pass (p=none sp=none pct=100) action=none header.from=arm.com; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=armh.onmicrosoft.com; arc=pass (0 oda=1 ltdi=1 spf=[1,1,smtp.mailfrom=arm.com] dkim=[1,1,header.d=arm.com] dmarc=[1,1,header.from=arm.com])
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=arm.com; dkim=pass header.d=arm.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=GkPoq7KHg8gvsjBSRB/PlTQJD+gulsNomEHgbBYpi+c=; b=Ze8K81t8qo+KerieDLDtGGuMXYtb9ejTdU9aiT9oJxIH4RrkDqDO8+dVLh22dl0YL3GO0pRW6mj81IDhtHFbEBKssjwW4WKmf8xNtNTim5m6Ob0RWPHv4l2h8YYVhCooisyUYCm+V6TPn0JzPINCkZuMhBbpDUW9yjONY+wnq98P6q+Nx9ji1s47SZLZTnNzvIuLAfjYABv19Faa57GMGvAkBMAjW7bW9HEOFPnkZMc5QEoaCheg09XpwYamrKJWRNEFY4dT2ggDa+OWvc5xcA6qqG63GSPFnVVGmz844YIHcHzj0kdK5EsTdRvIws2MtdafiBXrXl+xG0g926Jovg==
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=GkPoq7KHg8gvsjBSRB/PlTQJD+gulsNomEHgbBYpi+c=; b=bfi1LIZT+vaVldUjW6z6rmO6ViICl+edNVXu6Ptf7IloEvgBmaXgKROmb/0tANBzL4IzqhVXZUUEIi2isrKo3R4bKq3H/wXYGW4+Pm61omdUEkSQPmqADtSDR8nytPLLpNtiNXfWpvEo2hBO93JRxxIMFnsx0ALAMgz3/gNRjsft8Kdau7f88lNbhx+VHNinHDTlzfgDatb3Q2nTmp/YvIHmNl1kSj9oHZBxdQHv1r0PalSev/IiUTG+eaYrgNrN5JzdJsVLqant8pUtPMIbgdlx6tqXCv0IgKeGtKAoEeFaascXF5M0Uwh9mpSESvsmiYxudwmqeomx4xu7rXz62Q==
- Arc-seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=pass; b=Qi3P9WgRnMO3ufrf4imC2nhrXLn3q/5vmrAt5fiqNQ+U2Z1w6CskmQnSgb3B5B3GFMAWgJIhV1Kn76RpB1ThXSCe6cODx3A3c/NuGzw1UtyVISaN3ZpRfVZ5zPzDbpMvjMnX9FUazmW/uXNkyjn5tra5+TAllDEOruyIkKK0e6soqx6uHqPhsHVNBWj2fS+nkjMgBvBAGOLUpaS5SyTNwtgDPuCXz0kdTuTNVjezgba+T3TZYRXqoJTc724k7pHfPe/v7rFl1oG5AJZt0xDLfmdRJwEB19i9TOB/oFW4MZcg/FMCxbr8mf2f9GSu7EgGzIdlUoAnFXVRizygHcsSBw==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=G2yQYbDY55nzg3UXte7ZlbgImTKQlcsn8XUeFcUtf1A+z0egoXIdwkxLqtnOl/Brt6SlnMNbA6Y9+iqAAmzJs54fgSfYECNo1TgEt+iGvp1/NTKKcto7a/kMGhiyujSAl9SBVudCuUKrLFP1TXN+1P6CpP/PsEIBoZXl2p7B79oPIvUvamh968oneGjczV9dpmpFjb1ZnI4wibKQ4YpcCeowGfHGCZZyBoHFGnMjfGzqN3T21v32YoS21iM8i1L6cl73JKnkjTJsE05LHFwiYnopSjNwC4UtR3pysIDJ4+9kib2fYBnWzA7flt9yG+cUpE+CM+3+5XkfCbZWhGSeKw==
- Authentication-results-original: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=arm.com;
- Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Fri, 11 Nov 2022 14:12:25 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
- Nodisclaimer: true
- Original-authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=arm.com;
- Thread-index: AQHY9cAA3X9w+pjMxES5dLMt0fkbDa45tnoAgAABRRCAAAr5gIAAALlw
- Thread-topic: [PATCH 2/3] CHANGELOG: Add missing entries for work during the 4.17 release
Hi Jan,
> -----Original Message-----
> On 11.11.2022 14:58, Henry Wang wrote:
> > Another question for adding another entry for x86 that worth to
> > brag about a little bit: I did another dig into patchwork and found that
> > this [1] might be a good candidate. IIUC __ro_after_init is a good
> > feature that both x86 and Arm have leveraged in different level today,
> > so probably the __ro_after_init might worth an entry in CHANGELOG.
> >
> > However I saw your comments in [1] so I am not really sure if you are
> > happy with that, maybe we need to change the wording a little bit to
> > remove your concern? Would you mind sharing some thoughts?
>
> My view hasn't changed, but if Andrew and Roger think this should be
> mentioned,
> then I'm not going to stand in the way.
Thanks for the confirmation. I will wait for Roger's back on next Monday
then.
Kind regards,
Henry
>
> Jan
>
> > [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/xen-
> devel/patch/20220309123936.16991-3-andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx/
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Henry
> >>
> >> Jan
|
