[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: vnuma_nodes missing pnode 0
- To: Henry Wang <Henry.Wang@xxxxxxx>, Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 09:18:42 +0100
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=suse.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=nXFe90L2XRJ0XtiplkbFA/f+LUhTE/ryZkdQXNNeaUc=; b=VDra0JVDrWbfmHaPIXvU7x6MmcQfiFX2M71wbvsXOmvKjyF7ffyk/H1sqtSwY6Ex1vGYPglJJQDm7rod/yh5S01AVQL2c6XlLzKOfUeGGLA7jUQuqHEH+wt2N7Uz4nn63IjeJ27AqdqamNOWhOWZ23pfNO5nbQY3vVm9+7mEzC2UVMd8S4q7I5+lDMrqWdmRsQbUTD3fFTMQOMHhabmHTCrSQ5wVJmHVFIGWcdSy5HKlhozGIW0APG5/zhKeXOVq7V71V0+bnArS1c+a5mQ0HuRRvGvxJFihrkrqdgIP2zXDVFrm0GwPnhHa4fg/PW4F6b5lcZjFRFjyF3rdT+qEbQ==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=WD2Wmj8q4q55KKs9yMQscN35ILy2wKfKSkNOmZA3pUA4FDY2jybSGBip8uXhl3eb/nn8M0f/Q71z0jJHoTVzAHAMKQUyvxVBbByxDiwV9EiLMHyRyw5UYguSzHAsy7jR9kvFd3OPCpfHoivm6BfUJVF829AjMMvVGhbn4y9l22Khb7Xa0/M5ja0g1F46Mrpt2Lp2FPexfIzv9dm9gC9I9Oc2FHqrALRO7b1GfZRpVTfJjKAFBnKhomumTUKpe20ffZyII1Z55F/26INMhnR2p3EhIDdIDg4UTMBph1Tz0Qabx3B7zsM0ZAoyCU1/njPS5aFZXXaogI1R0RnI7wEeWw==
- Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=suse.com;
- Cc: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@xxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 08:18:48 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 14.11.2022 07:43, Henry Wang wrote:
> Sorry, missed Anthony (The toolstack maintainer). Also added him
> to this thread.
Indeed there's nothing x86-ish in here, it's all about data representation.
It merely happens to be (for now) x86-specific data which is being dealt
with.
Internally I indicated to Jim that the way the code presently is generated
it looks to me as if 0 was simply taken as the default for "pnode". What I
don't know at all is whether the concept of any kind of default is actually
valid in json representation of guest configs.
Jan
>> (Add x86 maintainers for more visibility)
>>
>> Hi x86 maintainers,
>>
>> Since this report might be related with the release, if you have time,
>> please have a look. Thank you very much.
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Henry
|
