[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: vnuma_nodes missing pnode 0
- To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>, Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Henry Wang <Henry.Wang@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 08:23:05 +0000
- Accept-language: zh-CN, en-US
- Arc-authentication-results: i=2; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 63.35.35.123) smtp.rcpttodomain=lists.xenproject.org smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dmarc=pass (p=none sp=none pct=100) action=none header.from=arm.com; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=armh.onmicrosoft.com; arc=pass (0 oda=1 ltdi=1 spf=[1,1,smtp.mailfrom=arm.com] dkim=[1,1,header.d=arm.com] dmarc=[1,1,header.from=arm.com])
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=arm.com; dkim=pass header.d=arm.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=udlqaRv59/uhgmT2ydhP1Tf+ZQ80ekLRtjCVDZyr1u8=; b=UD1B5zQreEZ8SzE3xAhaWD3FaofAETXqUePnVCXzKHzVKDwrhL+BqJ0bKTnDRVQ6q5fmlesxfWDEhT2DVXtLK5JALouKfR9VewQsdPaVH4lei6g4Br2IeH0d+b8Po4xq6rn2em6GVLvkbhaZi/kXrnrdsKs6TLU6QlKvwHCGL10wKA6C1f64Vh8wb7hYpIhVoZeog5W6nhKwGP/yIVekkrVBJ6di3YH04AE11YK2ouGkN9cFOUvDU2yczqc4qrfYP1TY+kVuaSgZFDv+1ibTfDgRdUMJCrTzMgJpHPLXq6IJJmwdCQH8NPECL41Rl3HYsYdwMRnnToBevcdQ1oJhVA==
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=udlqaRv59/uhgmT2ydhP1Tf+ZQ80ekLRtjCVDZyr1u8=; b=YIIrXFTuPRjq8hbWk6uglFL8Ty3dhkK4RGfkDeizT3XUQWCCLIp7k8MccH2Q/RxFdTRgNulgjkWkA7In3vcKXYj7gf8QzVuJ6EWaZXLMHxnKy7GoUOt/YHdGFyj7wx1nY0rZzBUv3JFBAJZQh4p/Ai6tqKZoKXmT54ehfhh1Ec+clEgfGiD6J4gNTkctcsEmZhwpMMABmWTMHw8j+Nh5pzm3pQdwUxjjN2JwpgqZHiZylvNSmdj/ZYVYW9VtVmcBeoCGHI16SaImqDsOIwqNs356x6wulSC64hz5Q5iSEKMR1TryMOO7bEEvVxCwixNxMluKByqhkl1gLUQo6wBGSA==
- Arc-seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=pass; b=NEVrn6M7TTUMIOgnfeioFwJQ6KASZmLS1OJhIHdzIRGGd1Abz8znyQHSCPOj7WIbfaRu3hAtsTUBCrlxQtU155YlL4LSYm5eWnkmMJV2D0Nwh/8e70crBcOAJK0uWQcjs9Yx5To+S6lnxInl0H0NwE4lS/aAitRRXAVdkXX62okiEsI70IWG+lqWxptXKOfvmW0nNLChgNyJCJf50HAjGu+Bju17j3YJsT3blO8USPLlclEzQbIaH/o5tKqrZdRwzpywOQ5n1eYbi6wjwSYvrt25+5F7yJ/odifWW2TUiLJsJiVEL5OF8Fupz6n3NUtFuGbCIOqzUVHlPvJPHeaIZw==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=aGfCd+F+xZOuYX2RgQiDHrqCP8OocjCtijBuarku4yr7Pd8h+qujNQUleJiSsGZ6jxmXxwNHMNsvwn3kLF/VVd4XQjUho31SVcSmkIpgOrgMJ+w8CSqBwIIVOB6fG3CsjGPuAbRjJpM6mpaHAYFNyNcFMlw3IYdkcORd4WtmDmf37Gx/FqcygUDIIez4j+36rs75pKYjgyDX8loEC3f+FY2FaqvaqbtfZdvbZ/S461GFz0P3KA120c1rnsMYFvEMDc4SvMa6nRXKJ1qxeP2UspeJbSKdP1HVs48Ta137vZgPnEfdFJK18c3Dh8zia/+7zKaV0tS+PFlWAipDIso2jw==
- Authentication-results-original: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=arm.com;
- Cc: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jim Fehlig <jfehlig@xxxxxxxx>, xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Mon, 14 Nov 2022 08:23:24 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
- Nodisclaimer: true
- Original-authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=arm.com;
- Thread-index: AQHY9iDYCXvlfuymEU2cRUBeAI3Esq49n+1wgABcSsCAABrwAIAAAERw
- Thread-topic: vnuma_nodes missing pnode 0
Hi Jan,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: vnuma_nodes missing pnode 0
>
> On 14.11.2022 07:43, Henry Wang wrote:
> > Sorry, missed Anthony (The toolstack maintainer). Also added him
> > to this thread.
>
> Indeed there's nothing x86-ish in here, it's all about data representation.
> It merely happens to be (for now) x86-specific data which is being dealt
> with.
Thank you for looking into this issue :)
>
> Internally I indicated to Jim that the way the code presently is generated
> it looks to me as if 0 was simply taken as the default for "pnode".
Yeah this also matches my first thought. I also did a git blame and didn't
really see some recent commits that change this part of logic.
> What I
> don't know at all is whether the concept of any kind of default is actually
> valid in json representation of guest configs.
Let's see if Anthony has some ideas :)
Kind regards,
Henry
>
> Jan
>
> >> (Add x86 maintainers for more visibility)
> >>
> >> Hi x86 maintainers,
> >>
> >> Since this report might be related with the release, if you have time,
> >> please have a look. Thank you very much.
> >>
> >> Kind regards,
> >> Henry
|
