[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v2 0/8] x86emul: a few small steps towards disintegration
- To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- From: Roger Pau Monné <roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 16:27:25 +0200
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=citrix.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=citrix.com; dkim=pass header.d=citrix.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=D6e9yUkeExtSMix4yJ7tPcifc8tfU+ivlAi1upaQmqU=; b=U3kg0N17cRkuB7KN0odRAcGK83zH20Y92659IDniowLXm8lWzVF8Sgl+qlJRxSNB/si5mKMHMN+e9Wao94jKnUbw5xz0OFRUd+MbLyzy2hFobHLhsLlrDZXwwUa2Oh7nJGXfT8CsBqsAvIlHA9PNGtdjIU9K2eDEpaZAMZgSRT0aLxQmqpoEoyrlnI3elgaGXyW24rZvdAqvOEAWk4iJxaIx8TE5u1rY2l5deb523O+KjNBoog0z062UMRKTAwftrRPt+92yDABnhS1+715nseS9juyjon61bGYjtmryHfM1mcL/g0wlt9CPZDp+wKX0DNoNFDfYRK9J0vm9CR9JtQ==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=kRuSfGJ3VCCu5l1og6AIlMRjnxVrZvyNqI2ega0ljpHGAJuy2ZjZKj4IPiKEoc6KC8FXLQEcLAskenkqAtyHOijFuDT3TZzr2dHlryrVJaNRn1CwEjLRs77Ck5JSALyUtDcUuD3w9DtKwGW93PAyZx8IVQuHuutvtzOrZDobJrHvNMEC7U1LfomRkc5g1oeEulSBvSMcQ9lLaJzotvKf+wFPb95MSmOjBWVl67egggxwXwGL/Vud+WCPV6sF7oeXppqDKamTpviRg6yeeQEflyc82HSZzbJtg5WZzx4iiMdeSjbQD38JimdJ8wJwX5Cte/z0hQjBnW0j1YL+x6TlRQ==
- Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=citrix.com;
- Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Thu, 30 Mar 2023 14:27:51 +0000
- Ironport-data: A9a23:Kf0LQq2sqiZwgilUlPbD5fVwkn2cJEfYwER7XKvMYLTBsI5bp2cPz TEWCz2FOfmNYzfye4oib4nlo0kB78XRx9UxQVE6pC1hF35El5HIVI+TRqvS04F+DeWYFR46s J9OAjXkBJppJpMJjk71atANlVEliefTAOK6ULWeUsxIbVcMYD87jh5+kPIOjIdtgNyoayuAo tq3qMDEULOf82cc3lk8tuTS+HuDgNyo4GlD5gdlPagR1LPjvyJ94Kw3dPnZw0TQGuG4LsbiL 87fwbew+H/u/htFIrtJRZ6iLyXm6paLVeS/oiI+t5qK23CulQRrukoPD9IOaF8/ttm8t4sZJ OOhF3CHYVxB0qXkwIzxWvTDes10FfUuFLTveRBTvSEPpqFvnrSFL/hGVSkL0YMkFulfI15h1 tIROi8xZSvZicOon+qCe/lzv5F2RCXrFNt3VnBI6xj8VK9jbbWdBqLA6JlfwSs6gd1IEbDGf c0FZDFzbRPGJRpSJlMQD5F4l+Ct7pX9W2QA9BTJ+uxqvC6Kk1YZPLvFabI5fvSQQspYhACAr 3/u9GXlGBAKcteYzFJp91r13rSQxHKnBd16+LuQ+d1xpUHP6V0qLDosdH+UrvOdrmCcVIcKQ 6AT0m90xUQoz2SpRNTgWxyzoFafowURHdFXFoUS+AyLj6bZ/QudLmwFVSJaLswrstcsQj4n3 UPPmMnmbRRwtJWFRHTb8a2bxQ5eIgAQJG4GICMBEw0M5oC6pJlp102VCNF+DKSyk9v5Xynqx CyHpzQ/gLNVitMX06K8/hbMhDfESoX1czPZLz7/BgqNhj6Vrqb/D2B0wTA3Ncp9Ebs=
- Ironport-hdrordr: A9a23:aSVtlq28JogdetT6jkkigwqjBB8kLtp133Aq2lEZdPUzSL3oqy nOpoVk6faQskdtZJhOo6H3BEC/ewKlyXcY2/hnAV+NNDOW3ldABrsSiLcL+lXbakrDHgQ079 YYT0EGMqyVMbEYt7eL3ODbKade/DDdytHSuQ629R4EJmwHBM8Aj3YbNu+1KDwNeOAsP+tLKH Pz3Ls6m9JgEU5nDPiTNz0iRfLfq8fX0L3vYRsbHBI8gTP+/w+A2frdCQKE0g0CFwxC2q0j92 /e1zH57rjLiYDO9jbsk0nI9Ylbgsak9ddZHsyLjdJQFzTtkG+TFfFccozHmiwpr+Sm71RvtN HNphMpOK1IgU/sQg==
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 01:40:43PM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 30.03.2023 11:54, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 09:53:23AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> On 29.03.2023 16:17, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > Patch 8 I'm unsure, I guess it should be up to the user to decide
> > whether to use -Os or some other optimization?
> >
> > I expect introspection users likely care way more about the speed
> > rather than the size of the generated x86 emulator code?
>
> Perhaps. But do we want to introduce another Kconfig control just
> for that? And wouldn't there likely be other performance concerns,
> if performance really mattered in the introspection case?
I don't really have a strong opinion on the usage of -Os or not. It's
likely fine as long as we also stay consistent with the flag we use
when building the test harness and the fuzzer, just in case.
Thanks, Roger.
|
