[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v6 00/16] x86/mtrr: fix handling with PAT but without MTRR
- To: Juergen Gross <jgross@xxxxxxxx>
- From: Borislav Petkov <bp@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2023 11:58:21 +0200
- Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, x86@xxxxxxxxxx, linux-hyperv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, mikelley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@xxxxxxxxx>, "K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Wei Liu <wei.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>, Dexuan Cui <decui@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@xxxxxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@xxxxxxx>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Wed, 31 May 2023 09:58:45 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On Wed, May 31, 2023 at 11:31:37AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
> What it did would have been printed if pr_debug() would have been
> active. :-(
Lemme turn those into pr_info(). pr_debug() is nuts.
> Did you check whether CONFIG_MTRR_SANITIZER_ENABLE_DEFAULT was the same in
> both
> kernels you've tested?
Yes, it is enabled.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
|
