[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [PATCH] libxl: Add missing libxl__virtio_devtype to device_type_tbl array
On 26.07.2023 17:13, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote: > On 26.07.23 17:50, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 26.07.2023 16:14, Oleksandr Tyshchenko wrote: >>> From: Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@xxxxxxxx> >>> >>> Without it being present it won't be possible to use some >>> libxl__device_type's callbacks for virtio devices as the common code >>> can only invoke these callbacks (by dereferencing a pointer) for valid >>> libxl__device_type's elements when iterating over device_type_tbl[]. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Oleksandr Tyshchenko <oleksandr_tyshchenko@xxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> tools/libs/light/libxl_create.c | 1 + >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) >>> >>> diff --git a/tools/libs/light/libxl_create.c >>> b/tools/libs/light/libxl_create.c >>> index 393c535579..c91059d713 100644 >>> --- a/tools/libs/light/libxl_create.c >>> +++ b/tools/libs/light/libxl_create.c >>> @@ -1887,6 +1887,7 @@ const libxl__device_type *device_type_tbl[] = { >>> &libxl__dtdev_devtype, >>> &libxl__vdispl_devtype, >>> &libxl__vsnd_devtype, >>> + &libxl__virtio_devtype, >>> NULL >>> }; >> >> From description and nature of the change this looks like a Fixes: >> tag would be warranted. > > Looks like, yes. Thanks. > > I guess, this should point to the commit that introduced > libxl__virtio_devtype > > Fixes: 43ba5202e2ee ('libxl: add support for generic virtio device') In light of Anthony's feedback I'm now thinking that no Fixes: tag should be here, as is being clarified by the addition to the description (which I guess can be folded in while committing). Jan
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |