[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [XEN PATCH v2 3/7] x86: add deviation comments for asm-only functions
- To: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- From: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 10:04:47 +0200
- Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, michal.orzel@xxxxxxx, xenia.ragiadakou@xxxxxxx, ayan.kumar.halder@xxxxxxx, consulting@xxxxxxxxxxx, andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx, roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 08:05:00 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
- vmx_asm_vmexit_handler
Isn't this just a declaration:
void nocall vmx_asm_vmexit_handler(void);
while the function to be deviated is this:
void vmx_vmexit_handler(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
Am I correct?
--
Nicola Vetrini, BSc
Software Engineer, BUGSENG srl (https://bugseng.com)
|
