[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [XEN PATCH v2 3/7] x86: add deviation comments for asm-only functions
- To: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetrini@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 10:57:49 +0200
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=suse.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=suse.com; dkim=pass header.d=suse.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=I3+NXjmF/TaXgYfqK+BH/JVAO+YO2KV37s5GmeVG/Dw=; b=X9gb0OKY39Lpbp99oesH5AMVCRvPajwZrzW5x/XuhH3vayo0Zisu1uY7V8EruehStwUWNqV9jhyYh2LEFXQlQJdzcU20Yrwf9LRd818m8sB+tHoovrVCTjpgeIYzgXV3q48MmQpkOnvS58hUGU+Dn1R595IWVbo6r92mgSlWr7e25phkUaTWP7QndxJAOiziBcYhdjmrjaxpsfMvXxjwLiMsbZxjy+MF52FTUhd+Dy9CtfliUMHS7zcaSK/epEoxxPIKeIjLD4AiILrYkFVg+vMdhOvkXKr99LJx4dTK3wl2TtoK9GE5V1/uFNb29EfCghVV9DyaYiwTLZwKVm9WpQ==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=T62FDYKLBwG22ccGIE1KZ4DO9P8Yy7yNFepqWdtVpHucVYvoDwZ37tZ887TbKxN8Q7h8R9F7xDUPtL7ezt/5dI0Pc5ur6LkZbYJVYuoQl9/eIJxVVMdyYCGdLR6DiAs1iULSyOeDowOi8YGUX7rnjV+3Sqrp0yjZJvyxLSxFGYJxkJlfswSyjMzPxY+344Py2dQa/hFcjDQdeDN8FbMjN/xUzFtacOm/PpQ7EZtzw+hYLPUgox+WWfbsbNEGfrrDjeRxgD2p0jNS8et0b4+W7drdBAjDBRIwu6MqE3FLKiIVInJOcL9IrqT0rzFmmT+jx5h6wnm/XD33/EDirK5E9Q==
- Authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=suse.com;
- Cc: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, michal.orzel@xxxxxxx, xenia.ragiadakou@xxxxxxx, ayan.kumar.halder@xxxxxxx, consulting@xxxxxxxxxxx, andrew.cooper3@xxxxxxxxxx, roger.pau@xxxxxxxxxx, Wei Liu <wl@xxxxxxx>, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Thu, 19 Oct 2023 08:58:03 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
On 19.10.2023 10:04, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
>
>>> - vmx_asm_vmexit_handler
>>>
>
> Isn't this just a declaration:
>
> void nocall vmx_asm_vmexit_handler(void);
>
> while the function to be deviated is this:
>
> void vmx_vmexit_handler(struct cpu_user_regs *regs)
>
> Am I correct?
Looks like you are, yes.
Jan
|
