[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] arm/dom0less: introduce Kconfig for dom0less feature
- To: Michal Orzel <michal.orzel@xxxxxxx>
- From: Luca Fancellu <Luca.Fancellu@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2023 09:05:54 +0000
- Accept-language: en-GB, en-US
- Arc-authentication-results: i=2; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass (sender ip is 63.35.35.123) smtp.rcpttodomain=lists.xenproject.org smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dmarc=pass (p=none sp=none pct=100) action=none header.from=arm.com; dkim=pass (signature was verified) header.d=armh.onmicrosoft.com; arc=pass (0 oda=1 ltdi=1 spf=[1,1,smtp.mailfrom=arm.com] dkim=[1,1,header.d=arm.com] dmarc=[1,1,header.from=arm.com])
- Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=arm.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=arm.com; dkim=pass header.d=arm.com; arc=none
- Arc-message-signature: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=8KwrrXqSUCORrwez7T+hnBNJJy8Eq5YVwcKK7KyiIQ4=; b=G9i7ssttYwzwgxj/LecHxuoEMCVyirgkRCzbcSp2ljS74qzzxvT+LrBQu3S1poecwXF51k2jFgGoynF1rZtgUAPikP58Vk1BQrusZQRncu3SA5+/SAYSan1ebEiJV/p67ewVB2HMoStkYvtYejPpKL6JhErFroLhZ5aeL1PcqFpumOXEJpi/QqFEhmQOh6ym81+UzicyUeLnwPv9H7SuiajbByTEPEI1bbcKlr1mK0mLcBNmLQd3ZBUi81RB8HQjHO/2VxpufgM1aI+/gsZLEQEGZ5y6AIJsl5LuyLAoXzS5VDyJl+GaQ+Ih/2XiOZ4MtGuxwowAbCmKwwd1m+3b4g==
- Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=8KwrrXqSUCORrwez7T+hnBNJJy8Eq5YVwcKK7KyiIQ4=; b=EYd4yelbdQu40lsUdIfodvn6Lb19oczTyr50AaAVypr0QVSQo2m8NhjQiXMaeQMNVZV9W22lVvb2ZjKAXNRNHOm6b5F7/jiuM7WkZFEmHt3IFXjphMXMlsUIfoAqoMrzWr2rrNFWq2z8M0NFYaFFe42xVBuQjjIpZt+m1cuvRn+dchBDFFfHirLNnSp0jb5Q1F0ezza+cnDI6CXfinJDaBNkURYnESZ8Yghv9X733s7achhyADCM3jVlxksD/KY8h00AGacSJb8r2aNK8qGpYsAcD9Rd+QP/B8yo9jY1xDnI2F1Nnk6zm3oAzQyg7lABij1XhOTU2ah5vLQ0BzOPHQ==
- Arc-seal: i=2; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=pass; b=FmqkU4y0EaXRz6K9LtK+eqZB5V0jQdYCrEBgM8H7UjbAwvhKCTH0cKgUfDMye9jqp/YIwObXGIGuABA1YTnNgIpBM3zy7IK6s4UhtEesaoXOUl9O/iBirf/4lTX4astJKI0Wh+KNL24nA9f8pnraULdaz+L2JvJnvsADdMmpOoCYE+iTP47Kb/ss8N/8FeS3gDM8wso4FQVQnZA7KtedjsdDDxUqaK7Yl6uuWKVdPbZlfU9UWyzRtC3qWDpW23f6WGHHEjxRN1gWhC46iMaNIoLNU/xAVGid7nIediWlNBSSAwvzgy1Wp6S9VOAesFGMo8lSV9J3bMLnFyDJvgaN3A==
- Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=CZzhELc5xnohFXRj8pPag1b1SqVf03LdxD7smsl0Z9jwiqmmW3x5eD448lpERCRDZSKXT5VE8IOSANuT939fz77AGhxzpJnRq8nSuEpnsiaajZdOjh8pypWgfTQElCXOrpkw79ua7MmK7EOoxLkySERY0m/P5vFXMOYJdmqCy5yGLdN5595JZFx3eWXufKTsp18RS+OxyHvfL4ANutn+bD7913eXA7Bv5tYGEeb4fErCN6gQi19aqBkKS8Jq1oWy/DQ0pySOPssdwSJ4kLymwK2owiTMj2bOOSN9EW2+Hr2xpaL9xs86KuVnDVtZOEC/BUyHTrEdi5A/425iL7fGSA==
- Authentication-results-original: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=arm.com;
- Cc: Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@xxxxxxxxxx>, Julien Grall <julien@xxxxxxx>, Bertrand Marquis <Bertrand.Marquis@xxxxxxx>, Volodymyr Babchuk <Volodymyr_Babchuk@xxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Fri, 10 Nov 2023 09:06:15 +0000
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xenproject.org>
- Nodisclaimer: true
- Original-authentication-results: dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;dmarc=none action=none header.from=arm.com;
- Thread-index: AQHaEuwVAcRvSKcty0WG4JBMWUF0b7BzQ0WAgAABDgA=
- Thread-topic: [PATCH v3 5/5] arm/dom0less: introduce Kconfig for dom0less feature
Hi Michal,
>>
>> +config DOM0LESS_BOOT
>> + bool "Dom0less boot support" if EXPERT
>> + depends on ARM
> You're in the Arm Kconfig, so there should be no need for this dependency (it
> is implicit).
>
> Apart from that, we have 2 features: static mem and static shmem that are
> only meant for dom0less domUs.
> Shouldn't we make them dependent on DOM0LESS_BOOT? Otherwise, what is the
> purpose of selecting them
> with DOM0LESS_BOOT=n?
Sure, I’ll add the dependencies and remove the ARM one
>
> ~Michal
|
