[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xen-users] Re: domU network fails under load - vif breaks
I have a backup running on four Windows HVM domains (I know you asked for someone using PV domUs, but these are running on the PV network interfaces, as I am using James Harper's GPLPV drivers). All four DomUs are on the same Dom0, which has one gigabit connection. The backups are going toward a separate physical backup server. Here is a summary of said backups: HVM1: Start backup objects time 09/05/2008 1:11:04 AM Elapsed backup objects time 2 hours,14 minutes,30 seconds Completed 61743 objects, 9.33 GB (100%) HVM2: Start backup objects time 09/05/2008 2:18:36 AM Elapsed backup objects time 57 minutes,30 seconds Completed 38071 objects, 6.05 GB (100%) HVM3: Start backup objects time 09/05/2008 2:21:41 AM Elapsed backup objects time 57 minutes,15 seconds Completed 36175 objects, 5.94 GB (100%) HVM4: Start backup objects time 09/05/2008 1:17:47 AM Elapsed backup objects time 1 hour,30 minutes,30 seconds Completed 36101 objects, 5.92 GB (100%) As you can see, these backups overlap, so the network usage across the bridge/NIC would be even higher than what it takes to back up 6 GiB in just under an hour (I suspect that is quite a bit more than 3.6Mbps, but I haven't calculated or benchmarked). Also, as you can see here, they have been running for some time: [virtadmin@virt1 ~]$ sudo /usr/sbin/xm list Name ID Mem VCPUs State Time(s) Domain-0 0 2858 4 r----- 160986.6 xm1 17 2048 1 ------ 233816.8 xm2 18 1024 1 -b---- 188676.6 xm3 19 1024 1 -b---- 166046.2 xm4 20 1024 1 -b---- 171760.6 [virtadmin@virt1 ~]$ uptime 10:50:40 up 65 days, 20:45, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.01, 0.00 The DomUs are currently IDs 17-20 because of reboots for software installs, updates, and whatnot. xm1's output from systeminfo shows it has been up for 17 Days, 18 Hours, 24 Minutes, 31 Seconds. This is with the backup mentioned above running 5 times a week. Anyway, I am running Fedora 8 with a kernel from their repo. I have attached the .config for that kernel in case you want to compare. The version matches yours, but it's hard telling what additional patches the Fedora kernel might include (though technically said patches would be available with the source, which should be downloadable from multiple mirrors, so I guess it's not so hard telling). Hope this is helpful, Dustin -----Original Message----- From: xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xen-users-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Paul Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 18:43 Cc: xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [Xen-users] Re: domU network fails under load - vif breaks > > On Sep 1, 2008, at 8:57 AM, Paul wrote: > > > > At a certain point that I have not established exactly, the > network load takes out the pv network. For example, if I initiate > a bittorrent session in a pv domU, I get a slow build up of > network load, and then connectivity is lost to both of the pv > domU's. If I console into them, they cannot ping outside the > network, but they can ping their own interfaces. A tcpdump on the > dom0 physical shows no traffic. However, during all this, the hvm > domains are able to use their network connections without issues. > > I have experienced the same issue with Ubuntu 8.04. The only solution > I have found is to limit the rate of the nic so that it doesn't reach > a transfer rate that breaks the networking. > Pepe > Thanks Pepe. My last test showed the network breaking at 3.6Mbs - too slow to lower the nic rate, and having networking running that slow would make the vm unusable for its purpose. I have upgraded Xen from 3.2.1 to 3.3, and the problem remains, which means I have changed: 1) Change domU kernel (2.6.21, 2.6.24, 2.6.25) 2) Change domU userland (gentoo, ubuntu) 3) Change dom0 physical nic + driver (Realtek 8169 -> 8168) 4) Change Xen version (3.2.1 -> 3.3) The only thing I haven't changed is the dom0 kernel. I am using a stock 2.6.21-xen gentoo kernel, so it would be great if anyone watching this that has pv domUs working under a 2.6.21 kernel would post their .config so I can compare it to mine. Thanks, Paul _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users Attachment:
config-2.6.21.7-3.fc8xen _______________________________________________ Xen-users mailing list Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |